Re: [PATCH xserver] glamor: Drop the non-VAO rendering path

2017-11-14 Thread Eric Anholt
Adam Jackson writes: > GLES spells this extension as GL_OES_vertex_array_object, but it is > functionally equivalent to the GL_ARB version. Mesa has supported both > since 9.0, let's go ahead and require it. Excellent. Now to just start using VAOs as they're actually

[PATCH xserver] glamor: Drop the non-VAO rendering path

2017-11-02 Thread Adam Jackson
GLES spells this extension as GL_OES_vertex_array_object, but it is functionally equivalent to the GL_ARB version. Mesa has supported both since 9.0, let's go ahead and require it. Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson --- glamor/glamor.c| 8 ++--