Hello Hans,
On 29.09.2016 09:56, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 16:54, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to
Hi,
On 28-09-16 16:54, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to show it if we
report
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello,
On 28.09.2016 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by
Hello,
On 28.09.2016 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to show it if we
report success, or to hide
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
>> On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
> When the X server asks us to
On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
> On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to
Hello,
On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is
always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide
Hi,
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no sense to suppress the request if
the cursor is
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no sense to suppress the request if
the cursor is not currently visible.
Signed-off-by: Michael Thayer
12 matches
Mail list logo