Re: [PATCH xserver 00/13] GLX 1.4 cleanup and GLX_EXT_libglvnd

2016-03-30 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:11 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > There's a few small suggestions - of which the "print a warning if the > WGL extension is missing" (patch 5&7) and Eric's "use strdup over > malloc/memset" (patch 13) being somewhat serious. With those addressed > the series is >

Re: [PATCH xserver 00/13] GLX 1.4 cleanup and GLX_EXT_libglvnd

2016-03-30 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi Adam, On 23 March 2016 at 22:46, Adam Jackson wrote: > The previous series didn't quite do what I expected, because xwin and > xquartz didn't set the extension enable bits the same way as DRI. This > series moves the enable bits into the common GLX screen data, fixes the >

[PATCH xserver 00/13] GLX 1.4 cleanup and GLX_EXT_libglvnd

2016-03-23 Thread Adam Jackson
The previous series didn't quite do what I expected, because xwin and xquartz didn't set the extension enable bits the same way as DRI. This series moves the enable bits into the common GLX screen data, fixes the default enable state to apply to all backends, and moves more of the setup