On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 10:42 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Adam Jackson writes:
> > @@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ glamor_get_image_gl(DrawablePtr drawable, int x, int
> > y, int w, int h,
> > drawable->x + off_x, drawable->y + off_y,
> >
Adam Jackson writes:
> Same trick as in fb: just do a normal GetImage and deal with the
> planemask on the CPU if you have to. Since the software fallback hit for
> glamor is pretty brutal, this is a much more impressive win for glamor
> than it was for fb:
>
> 11100.0
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 13:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Same trick as in fb: just do a normal GetImage and deal with the
> planemask on the CPU if you have to. Since the software fallback hit for
> glamor is pretty brutal, this is a much more impressive win for glamor
> than it was for fb:
>
>
Same trick as in fb: just do a normal GetImage and deal with the
planemask on the CPU if you have to. Since the software fallback hit for
glamor is pretty brutal, this is a much more impressive win for glamor
than it was for fb:
11100.0 87700.0 (7.901) (copy 0x) ShmGetImage 10x10