Re: [PATCHv2] makekeys: Fix build/target word size mismatch when cross-compiling

2011-10-14 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 13/10/2011 10:57 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: Strictly speaking -I is a CPPFLAGS option. regards, guillem Indeed. New patch attached. - Derek From d2a41de4a67ea76065fc1d0e9495e084709d058d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011

Re: [PATCHv2] makekeys: Fix build/target word size mismatch when cross-compiling

2011-10-13 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:44:13 -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: diff --git a/src/util/Makefile.am b/src/util/Makefile.am index 3b100e0..09c27a2 100644 --- a/src/util/Makefile.am +++ b/src/util/Makefile.am @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ noinst_PROGRAMS=makekeys makekeys_CFLAGS = \ $(X11_CFLAGS) \

Re: [PATCHv2] makekeys: Fix build/target word size mismatch when cross-compiling

2011-10-12 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 22 September 2011 23:44, Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote: Since makekeys is built using build environment's gcc and runs natively, we have to make sure that the size of the Signature type is the same on both the native environment and the target, otherwise we get

[PATCHv2] makekeys: Fix build/target word size mismatch when cross-compiling

2011-09-22 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
Since makekeys is built using build environment's gcc and runs natively, we have to make sure that the size of the Signature type is the same on both the native environment and the target, otherwise we get mismatches upon running X, and some LSB test failures (xts5). Use an unsigned 32-bit