On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:14:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
Thanks for more eyes!
As always, I'm looking for rough consensus about this before I merge it
in; please let me know what you're looking for before it can
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:26:38PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:14:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
Thanks for more eyes!
As always, I'm looking for rough consensus about this
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:26:38PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:14:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
Thanks for more eyes!
As always, I'm looking for rough consensus about this before I
On Oct 2, 2011, at 00:10, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Was the libpciaccess issue solved ?
You're referring to the missing support from libpciaccess, yes? I'm still
waiting on comments from my comments on those patches.
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-September/025663.html
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 01:11:50AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Oct 2, 2011, at 00:10, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Was the libpciaccess issue solved ?
You're referring to the missing support from libpciaccess, yes? I'm still
waiting on comments from my comments on those patches.
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 01:11:50 -0700
On Oct 2, 2011, at 00:10, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Was the libpciaccess issue solved ?
You're referring to the missing support from libpciaccess, yes? I'm still
waiting on comments from my comments on
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:16:49 +
From: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
Hi,
On 24 September 2011 13:26, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It's still work. Â And it probably inflicts pain on people like Micahel
Daenzer who maintain drivers for older xserver releases. Â
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:31:11 +0200
From: Matthieu Herrb matthieu.he...@laas.fr
Still only a partial review; looking into the changes to the
interfaces that map video memory now.
I wanted to look, and more importantly test them, but so far the
IOADRESS fallout (plus a few other stuff
On Sep 26, 2011, at 06:10, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I don't really object to the canges to the in10 module (although the
libpciaccess API uses uint32_t instead of unsigned int). But please
keep the IOADDRESS typedef until the majority of the video drivers
have been converted to use the
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:14:57 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
Thanks for more eyes!
As always, I'm looking for rough consensus about this before I merge it
in; please let me know what you're looking for before it can be merged
to master.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:35:30PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 24, 2011, at 09:31, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
IOADDRESS is used massively throughout the drivers. I really don't
see why it needs to be removed. Leaving the typedef in xf86Pci.h will
save you/us a lot of work. At
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 09:47:15AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Hmm it fails to run because it seems that pci_device_map_legacy()
never actually made it in libpciaccess(). I found patches in may for
it but no actual commits to libpciaccess. Am I looking at the wrong
repository ?
On Sep 25, 2011, at 03:12, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 09:47:15AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Hmm it fails to run because it seems that pci_device_map_legacy()
never actually made it in libpciaccess(). I found patches in may for
it but no actual commits to libpciaccess.
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:21:54 -0700
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I'm also testing it on tifa32-linux tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2011-09-23-0007
A few failures in various video drivers ... but they
On Sep 24, 2011, at 03:01, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:21:54 -0700
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I'm also testing it on tifa32-linux tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2011-09-23-0007
A few
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:11:31 -0700
Only a few drivers actually use domainIOBase, but among those are
xf86-video-vesa and xf86-video-vmware drivers, which are pretty
important ones. The others are xf86-video-ark, xf86-video-sis and
Hi,
On 24 September 2011 13:26, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It's still work. And it probably inflicts pain on people like Micahel
Daenzer who maintain drivers for older xserver releases. And it also
inflicts pain on people who maintain drivers out of the git
repositories on
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:01:02PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:21:54 -0700
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I'm also testing it on tifa32-linux tinderbox:
On Sep 24, 2011, at 09:31, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
IOADDRESS is used massively throughout the drivers. I really don't
see why it needs to be removed. Leaving the typedef in xf86Pci.h will
save you/us a lot of work. At that point you might as well drop the
changesto remove IOADDRESS usage in
On Sep 24, 2011, at 12:35, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 24, 2011, at 09:31, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
IOADDRESS is used massively throughout the drivers. I really don't
see why it needs to be removed. Leaving the typedef in xf86Pci.h will
save you/us a lot of work. At that point you
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:52:05 -0700
The following changes since commit 7fb4bef0394a5d09680985d34bce8252b61493cb:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'mattst88/for-keith' (2011-09-21 14:34:27
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
Hi,
On 23 September 2011 15:10, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Unlike Tiago's origional changes this looks like it is actually going
somewhere, and generally this looks like a good idea, even if it
breaks some stuff temporarily. But I'd like to check that not too
many
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:52:05 -0700
The following changes since commit 7fb4bef0394a5d09680985d34bce8252b61493cb:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'mattst88/for-keith'
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:10:44 +0200 (CEST), Mark Kettenis
mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Unlike Tiago's origional changes this looks like it is actually going
somewhere, and generally this looks like a good idea, even if it
breaks some stuff temporarily. But I'd like to check that not too
On 09/23/2011 07:10 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Jeremy Huddlestonjerem...@apple.com
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:52:05 -0700
The following changes since commit 7fb4bef0394a5d09680985d34bce8252b61493cb:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'mattst88/for-keith' (2011-09-21 14:34:27 -0700)
are
Hi Keith,
I believe this failure is coming from b61950dc616402bbf3fb0774e9289d32c0f42c83
which removed these from xfree86/common/xf86str.h
#include xf86Pci.h
#include pciaccess.h
I squashed your change below into b61950dc616402bbf3fb0774e9289d32c0f42c83 and
pushed the new branch.
I'm also
On Sep 23, 2011, at 16:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Hi Keith,
I believe this failure is coming from
b61950dc616402bbf3fb0774e9289d32c0f42c83 which removed these from
xfree86/common/xf86str.h
#include xf86Pci.h
#include pciaccess.h
I squashed your change below into
The following changes since commit 7fb4bef0394a5d09680985d34bce8252b61493cb:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'mattst88/for-keith' (2011-09-21 14:34:27 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~jeremyhu/xserver master
Adam Jackson (16):
xfree86: Move
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:52:05 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~jeremyhu/xserver master
This sequence needs the following patch somewhere:
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86Cursors.c b/hw/xfree86/modes/xf86Cursors.c
index 23c48eb..e244a2d 100644
29 matches
Mail list logo
