Re: [xrandr v2] Select NearestNeighbour filtering for pixel exact scaling

2017-10-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 24/09/17 10:51 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Matt Turner (2017-09-01 22:17:58) >> Was there a reason this did not land? > > It needs a touch more work: [...] > As another note, changing the filter only has an effect if the > resolution/scaling is also altered." That could be due to X

Re: [xrandr v2] Select NearestNeighbour filtering for pixel exact scaling

2017-09-24 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matt Turner (2017-09-01 22:17:58) > Was there a reason this did not land? It needs a touch more work: "I was wondering, did you (or anyone else) follow up on this patch? I recently used it with good success, and would be happy if it was upstream. Especially as I am planning on getting a

Re: [xrandr v2] Select NearestNeighbour filtering for pixel exact scaling

2017-09-01 Thread Matt Turner
Was there a reason this did not land? ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Re: [xrandr v2] Select NearestNeighbour filtering for pixel exact scaling

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > When using pixel-exact scaling from for example running a 3840x2160 monitor > at 1920x1080 half-resolution upscaling using a bilinear filter > introduces blur where none is expected. > > v2: Allow the user to specify

[xrandr v2] Select NearestNeighbour filtering for pixel exact scaling

2016-04-04 Thread Chris Wilson
When using pixel-exact scaling from for example running a 3840x2160 monitor at 1920x1080 half-resolution upscaling using a bilinear filter introduces blur where none is expected. v2: Allow the user to specify what filter they want using --filter, but default to automatic selection. References: