On 24/09/17 10:51 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Matt Turner (2017-09-01 22:17:58)
>> Was there a reason this did not land?
>
> It needs a touch more work:
[...]
> As another note, changing the filter only has an effect if the
> resolution/scaling is also altered."
That could be due to X
Quoting Matt Turner (2017-09-01 22:17:58)
> Was there a reason this did not land?
It needs a touch more work:
"I was wondering, did you (or anyone else) follow up on this patch? I
recently used it with good success, and would be happy if it was
upstream. Especially as I am planning on getting a
Was there a reason this did not land?
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When using pixel-exact scaling from for example running a 3840x2160 monitor
> at 1920x1080 half-resolution upscaling using a bilinear filter
> introduces blur where none is expected.
>
> v2: Allow the user to specify
When using pixel-exact scaling from for example running a 3840x2160 monitor
at 1920x1080 half-resolution upscaling using a bilinear filter
introduces blur where none is expected.
v2: Allow the user to specify what filter they want using --filter, but
default to automatic selection.
References: