Antoine, thanks for the suggestion and the additional review. V2 patch
series forthcoming.
-- Ben
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Antoine Martin
wrote:
> On 09/03/18 05:11, Ben Crocker wrote:
> > Sent that a little too soon; please consider "Reviewed-by: Ben Crocker
On 09/03/18 05:11, Ben Crocker wrote:
> Sent that a little too soon; please consider "Reviewed-by: Ben Crocker
> >" to be
> added after each of the "Signed-off-by: Nicolai Haehnle
> >" lines.
Sent that a little too soon; please consider "Reviewed-by: Ben Crocker <
bcroc...@redhat.com>" to be
added after each of the "Signed-off-by: Nicolai Haehnle <
nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>" lines.
Also please note that I rebased Nicolai's original patch,
From: Nicolai Hähnle
From: Nicolai Hähnle
Having different types of code all trying to check for elevated privileges
is a bad idea. This implementation is the most thorough one.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle
---
From: Nicolai Hähnle
Having different types of code all trying to check for elevated privileges
is a bad idea. This implementation is the most thorough one.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c | 59