RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-29 Thread Huang, FrankR
: Jonathan Morton [mailto:jonathan.mor...@movial.com] Sent: 2010年5月28日 22:18 To: Huang, FrankR Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:34 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: I know if the source pict format is RGB24

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-29 Thread Huang, FrankR
@lists.x.org] On Behalf Of Huang, FrankR Sent: 2010年5月29日 16:10 To: Jonathan Morton Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite Thanks. Is there any difference in RGB24 and ARGB32 to display them on the screen without mask(mask=0)? The same? I

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-29 Thread Huang, FrankR
+frankr.huang=amd@lists.x.org] On Behalf Of Huang, FrankR Sent: 2010年5月29日 16:10 To: Jonathan Morton Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite Thanks. Is there any difference in RGB24 and ARGB32 to display them on the screen without mask(mask

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-28 Thread Huang, FrankR
To: 'Jonathan Morton' Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite Ok. The test is huge for the format. The whole format number(nformats) is 16, that includes a8r8g8b8,x8r8g8b8,a8,r5g6b5...x2b10g10r10. I think your suggest's format is used

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-28 Thread Jonathan Morton
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:34 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: I know if the source pict format is RGB24, the mask will do multiply each color. For example Red*alpha, Green*alpha, Blue*alpha. If the source pict format is ARGB32, how the calculate comes on? The same - the alpha channel and each

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-21 Thread Huang, FrankR
,Over,Clear)... I'll go on:) Thanks, Frank -Original Message- From: Jonathan Morton [mailto:jonathan.mor...@movial.com] Sent: 2010年5月21日 14:59 To: Huang, FrankR Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 14:28

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-21 Thread Jonathan Morton
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:51 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: Ok. The test is huge for the format. The whole format number(nformats) is 16, that includes a8r8g8b8,x8r8g8b8,a8,r5g6b5...x2b10g10r10. I think your suggest's format is used often. So I will point these format to tests. And maybe use one

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-21 Thread Huang, FrankR
: 2010年5月21日 16:17 To: Huang, FrankR Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:51 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: Ok. The test is huge for the format. The whole format number(nformats) is 16, that includes a8r8g8b8

RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite

2010-05-21 Thread Huang, FrankR
And after that, I think I can give patch to rendercheck:) -Original Message- From: Jonathan Morton [mailto:jonathan.mor...@movial.com] Sent: 2010年5月21日 16:17 To: Huang, FrankR Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; gtk-l...@gnome.org Subject: RE: GTK progressbar call on XRenderComposite On Fri