On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm not volunteering to do it, but I always thought it would be nice
if the doc macros actually tried to generate a test doc instead of
just checking for tools in the path. It's fairly easy to get xmlto in
your path but actually have a
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm not volunteering to do it, but I always thought it would be nice
if the doc macros actually tried to generate a test doc instead of
just checking for tools in
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:23 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm not volunteering to do it, but I always thought it would be nice
if the doc macros actually tried
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:23 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm not volunteering to do it,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 17:27:22 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
The macros have to be backward compatible. In 3 years from now, no one
will have
4.3 installed, so we will need to move up to 4.8. Building older
versions of tarballs
with older versions of docbook will not be possible.
Really?
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 00:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 17:27:22 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
The macros have to be backward compatible. In 3 years from now, no one
will have
4.3 installed, so we will need to move up to 4.8. Building older
versions of tarballs
Isn't w3m just one of the choices XMLTO might be using? I'm not sure we want
to try to replicate all the XMLTO configure options in every one of our modules.
-alan-
On 03/21/11 04:53 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
This tool is used under the cover by XMLTO to convert DocBook/XML
to text.
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:59 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Isn't w3m just one of the choices XMLTO might be using? I'm not sure
we want
to try to replicate all the XMLTO configure options in every one of
our modules.
There is also links and lynx. I checked that all platforms have w3m.
As
On 03/21/11 05:39 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:59 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Isn't w3m just one of the choices XMLTO might be using? I'm not sure we
want
to try to replicate all the XMLTO configure options in every one of our
modules.
There is also links and
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:59 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Isn't w3m just one of the choices XMLTO might be using? I'm not sure we
want
to try to replicate all the XMLTO configure options in every one of our
modules.
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 17:45 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Will it do anything if you don't modify all the Makefile.am's to add
#if
HAVE_W3M ? If you don't want text documentation generated, we should
give
a flag for that instead of guessing which utility xmlto might call to
generate
it.
11 matches
Mail list logo