On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:32 -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Sep 26, 2014 7:52 AM, Laércio de Sousa
laercioso...@sme-mogidascruzes.sp.gov.br wrote:
Now I've started playing with xf86-video-nested and Xephyr code,
trying to merge as much code as possible. It's still in an embrionary
stage, so I
On Sep 26, 2014 7:52 AM, Laércio de Sousa
laercioso...@sme-mogidascruzes.sp.gov.br wrote:
Now I've started playing with xf86-video-nested and Xephyr code, trying
to merge as much code as possible. It's still in an embrionary stage, so I
want to ask you some questions:
* Is there an official
I don't believe a driver is the correct thing to do. Xorg, in many
places, assumes it's on raw hardware and does things like modesetting and
VT switching, which obviously won't work in a nested environment.
Xorg 1.16 already avoids VT switching if it's a non-seat0 X server (i.e.,
if -seat option
I don't believe a driver is the correct thing to do. Xorg, in many places,
assumes it's on raw hardware and does things like modesetting and VT
switching, which obviously won't work in a nested environment.
Additionally, I think the Xorg maintainers think that less drivers is
better -- the
Hi there!
Some time ago, I've asked you about current situation of video drivers for
nested Xorg servers as an alternative to Xephyr. This is mentioned in
http://www.x.org/wiki/Releases/7.8/
Currently there's a project named xf86-video-nested, which is written
somehow independently from Xephyr,
