Re: libX11 build failure

2009-09-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Alan Coopersmith wrote: If it's selecting automake 1.10.2 then the check for AM_SILENT_RULES being defined should report that it's not and that section of the Makefile.am should be commented out. Well, it would have been if I'd put the AM_CONDITIONAL *before* the AC_OUTPUT that creates the

Re: libX11 build failure

2009-09-24 Thread Alan Coopersmith
The AM_SILENT_RULES macro in automake 1.11 should be setting AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY already. In my installation it's in /usr/share/aclocal-1.11/silent.m4 : case $enable_silent_rules in yes) AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY=0;; no) AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY=1;; *) AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY=m4_if([$1], [yes], [0],

Re: libX11 build failure

2009-09-24 Thread Florian Mickler
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:19:33 -0700 Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: The AM_SILENT_RULES macro in automake 1.11 should be setting AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY already. In my installation it's in /usr/share/aclocal-1.11/silent.m4 : case $enable_silent_rules in yes)

Re: libX11 build failure

2009-09-24 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Florian Mickler wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:19:33 -0700 Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: The AM_SILENT_RULES macro in automake 1.11 should be setting AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY already. In my installation it's in /usr/share/aclocal-1.11/silent.m4 : case

Re: libX11 build failure

2009-09-24 Thread Florian Mickler
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:19 -0700 Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: If it's selecting automake 1.10.2 then the check for AM_SILENT_RULES being defined should report that it's not and that section of the Makefile.am should be commented out. I think we'll need to get someone