On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:09:03PM +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
wrote:
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:21:55PM +0200, ext Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote:
I just reproduced something that sounds like what you're describing with
two
R520 cards (one X screen per card)
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:42:10 +0300
From: Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) tiago.vigna...@nokia.com
BTW, we _really_ should skip the arbitration after POST the cards. Right now
xf86VGAarbiterWrapFunctions is a total failure. It's totally prone to
deadlocks everywhere. In theory all
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:21:55PM +0200, ext Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote:
I just reproduced something that sounds like what you're describing with two
R520 cards (one X screen per card) and the 'radeon' driver. However, it seems
unrelated to my change; that's what the hang
Tiago,
On 05/19/2010 08:09 AM, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:21:55PM +0200, ext Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote:
I just reproduced something that sounds like what you're describing with
two R520 cards (one X screen per card) and the 'radeon'
Pierre and Peter,
commit 518f3b189b6c8aa28b62837d14309fd06163ccbb
Author: Pierre-Loup A. Griffais pgriff...@nvidia.com
Date: Wed Apr 21 16:46:17 2010 -0700
mi: don't thrash resources when displaying the software cursor across
screens
This commit break my system in a very bizarre way
Tiago,
This commit fixes the SW cursor with several screens, so the multi-card case
is more or less the point of the change. Can you be more specific about the
problems you're having and your testing environment? Do you have the SW cursor
forced on?
Removing the dependency on devPrivates
Tiago,
I just reproduced something that sounds like what you're describing with two
R520 cards (one X screen per card) and the 'radeon' driver. However, it seems
unrelated to my change; that's what the hang looks like:
575 VGAGet();
(gdb) bt
#0 VGAarbiterCreateGC (pGC=0x83ebab0)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Pierre-Loup A. Griffais
pgriff...@nvidia.com wrote:
Tiago,
I just reproduced something that sounds like what you're describing with two
R520 cards (one X screen per card) and the 'radeon' driver. However, it
seems unrelated to my change; that's what the hang