[PATCH 3/3] meson: Make Security extension optional

2018-02-13 Thread Laurent Carlier
Just mimic autoconf file, Security extension needs X-ACE extension Signed-off-by: Laurent Carlier <lordhea...@gmail.com> --- meson.build | 8 +++- meson_options.txt | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build index 59a0c59..5

Re: security extension

2014-01-08 Thread Ángel González
On 06/01/14 22:51, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 07:34:23PM -0500, Mouse wrote: [...the security extension...] A lot of people use X remotely with ssh which is unsafe without something like this. What's unsafe about that? I don't see anything offhand, but I haven't thought

Re: security extension

2014-01-06 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 07:34:23PM -0500, Mouse wrote: [...the security extension...] A lot of people use X remotely with ssh which is unsafe without something like this. What's unsafe about that? I don't see anything offhand, but I haven't thought about it for long enough

security extension

2014-01-05 Thread Martin Uecker
Hi all, I wonder what it would take to make the security extension more useful again. A lot of people use X remotely with ssh which is unsafe without something like this. Openssh has convenient support to run clients as untrusted. Atleast for the programs I use remotely this works well

Re: security extension

2014-01-05 Thread Mouse
[...the security extension...] A lot of people use X remotely with ssh which is unsafe without something like this. What's unsafe about that? I don't see anything offhand, but I haven't thought about it for long enough for that to mean much. /~\ The ASCII Mouse