Re: [PATCH] edid: Add quirk for ADA 1024x600 7" display.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Detailed mode reports 108 mm x 68 mm which is for smaller display. > Maximum image size reports 15 cm x 10 cm which aligns with its physical > size, use this size instead. > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng

Re: [edid-decode] [PATCH 2/2] Calculate DisplayID checksums. Refactor do_checksum.

Hi Mark, I haven't looked at the code in detail, I'm afraid. There's a general suggestion, which should be useful. As the commit summary indicates, this should be two separate patches. On 9 December 2016 at 17:39, Mark Ferry wrote: > --- > edid-decode.c | 40

Re: [PATCH xf86-video-dummy 0/4] Cleanups Redux

Hi Bob, On 9 December 2016 at 22:25, Bob Terek wrote: > > On 12/09/2016 03:13 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 6 December 2016 at 22:41, Bob Terek wrote: >>> >>> Resubmitting some of Aaron Plattner's cleanup patches to >>> xf86-video-dummy: >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH libpciaccess 1/2] linux sysfs: retrieve vendor, device... info via separate sysfs files

On 1 December 2016 at 18:17, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > Currently the kernel does not expose the revision file. With that about > to change (due in 4.10) we can read all the information required from > separate files and

Re: [PATCH xf86-video-dummy 2/6] Delete XV stuff

On 10 December 2016 at 02:35, Bob Terek wrote: > > On 01/24/2015 03:08 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote: >> >> As far as I can tell, this was never implemented or used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Plattner > > > Applied patch to current dummy driver, built,

Re: Xorg glx module: GLVND, EGL, or ... ?

On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 17:15 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Hi Adam, Andy, Kyle, > > > even with GLVND in place and used by Mesa and other GL implementations, > one remaining issue preventing peaceful coexistence of Mesa based and > other GLX implementations is that other GLX implementations tend

[RFC] Visual Class for On-Screen HDR Drawables

Hello all, For those who aren't aware, Andy Ritger gave a talk at XDC 2016 about what the advent of HDR displays means for the Linux ecosystem: https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2016/Program/ritger_hdr/. To make a long story short, displays capable of displaying HDR content mean that we need to

Re: Xorg glx module: GLVND, EGL, or ... ?

On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 16:08 +, Emil Velikov wrote: > Example: > Would happen if we one calls glXMakeCurrent which internally goes down > to eglMakeCurrent ? Are we going to clash since (iirc) one is not > allowed to do both on the same GL ctx ? No, for the same reason this already isn't a