> Peter Hutterer hat am 12. September 2018 um 06:50
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Fixes coverity complaints about potentially unterminated strings
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> sessreg.c | 26 +-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:09:22AM +0200, Walter Harms wrote:
>
>
> > Peter Hutterer hat am 12. September 2018 um 06:50
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Fixes coverity complaints about potentially unterminated strings
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> > ---
> > sessreg.c | 26
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 23:39, Walter Harms wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dave Airlie hat am 12. September 2018 um 03:40
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > From: Dave Airlie
> >
> > Coverity complains about a use after free in here after the
> > freeing, I can't follow the linked list so well, but whot
> > says
On 09/12/18 12:09 AM, Walter Harms wrote:
Peter Hutterer hat am 12. September 2018 um 06:50
geschrieben:
Fixes coverity complaints about potentially unterminated strings
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
sessreg.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9
There are a few conditions where coverity finds a use of an uninitialized
field of the name_t struct. These are rather messy combinations of conditions,
so let's go with the simple solution here and just init everything to 0.
This may still have side-effects but at least they'll be more obvious
> Dave Airlie hat am 12. September 2018 um 03:40
> geschrieben:
>
>
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> Coverity complains about a use after free in here after the
> freeing, I can't follow the linked list so well, but whot
> says the device can only be on one list once, so break should
> fix it.
>
>
