On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Timo Aaltonen timo.aalto...@aalto.fi wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
I may not have a complete picture of support issues, though. Ubuntu
apparently fails to send XCB-related bug reports upstream, for
Le 09/04/2010 20:36, Jamey Sharp a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
So what is the general recommendation at this point for how to ship
libX11? I'm still shipping a build --without-xcb mainly because we
wanted to play it safe during
See attached, from git-format-patch
Hopefully prevent crash that can occur from dodgy glyph data
(depends on the video driver in use whether the bad pointer turns up).
Please review.
From 1f20e3b0d130319af0af839ee7c048024b1b5d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root r...@eeepc.(none)
Date: Sat, 10
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:18 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
Now that glx doesn't call DRI2DestroyDrawable anymore, we don't need to
force a specific resource destruction order in the DestroyWindow hook.
I don't think DRI2DestroyDrawable was the only reason for this, see e.g.
commit
Now that the server has moved to using udev on linux, we have many
configurations that were working using hal fdi files that will no longer
be applied. The proper solution is to convert these configurations to
using InputClass sections. I've taken a script that Martin Pitt wrote
for parsing media