On 05/09/2011 01:53 AM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 11:48:26PM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
On 05/08/2011 05:07 PM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
(I think you mean without using Xinerama.)
no, I do mean with Xinerama. As I've written before the trick is to link
a screen to a display:
:99:0
Hi Mauro,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com (11/02/2011):
Mauro Carvalho Chehab (8):
Port xf86-video-v4l driver to V4L2
thanks for your work on it. Maybe it would be nice to have a release
at some point?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for digging that patch up, but it is incomplete. Let me plug in the
missing functions and do a little testing, then I'll post an updated patch.
Thanks,
-James
nvpublic
On 5/7/11 9:40 PM, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks - as you probably saw I pushed libXext
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org writes:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:44:15AM -0400, Søren Sandmann wrote:
The interface to these function was was very confusing since it gave
the impression that they initialized the region from a list of boxes,
which they didn't.
This patch changes the
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:18:29PM +0200, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org writes:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:44:15AM -0400, Søren Sandmann wrote:
The interface to these function was was very confusing since it gave
the impression that they initialized the region
Hey Keith,
clang found an issue in xrandr that I'd like you to review the fix for. I'm
fairly certain this is what you intended.
Thanks,
Jeremy
For reference:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~jeremyhu/analyzer/yuffie/20110509-/xrandr/report-gZOzCf.html#EndPath
http://cgit.freedesktop.org
Sorry I'm late but:
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org (05/05/2011):
Replace:
for (stuff; things; etc) {
if (misc || other) {
[...]
}
}
with:
for (stuff; things; etc) {
if (!misc !other)
continue;
[...]
}
that
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:56:50AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
yes, you're right, a real Xinerama is different cards combined in
one display.
See the multiseat setup here:
http://beforeafterx.blogspot.com/2011/02/multiseat-setup.html
As you see there, it's a multiseat sollution.
Well, to be
We have both desktop (for general graphics/media stuff) and mobile
tracks at this year's LPC.
So if you're working on a topic related to one of the above areas,
especially one that has open issues or spans multiple parts of the
stack, please submit a topic for discussion at
On Fri, 6 May 2011 18:18:14 +0300, ville.syrj...@nokia.com wrote:
The proposed DRI@ invalidate patch [1] causes a lot more invalidate events
to be sent out. That will cause processes to wake up needlessly. Eg. if
an unredirected fullscreen app is flipping, each flip will also send an
On Sat, 7 May 2011 18:20:17 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com wrote:
This was previously computed but never passed on to the caller.
Found-by: clang static analyzer
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
Doing something useful with those success flags would be nice,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:42:03PM -0700, ext Eric Anholt wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2011 18:18:14 +0300, ville.syrj...@nokia.com wrote:
The proposed DRI@ invalidate patch [1] causes a lot more invalidate events
to be sent out. That will cause processes to wake up needlessly. Eg. if
an
On 05/09/2011 06:37 PM, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:56:50AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
yes, you're right, a real Xinerama is different cards combined in
one display.
See the multiseat setup here:
http://beforeafterx.blogspot.com/2011/02/multiseat-setup.html
As you see there,
Well it's better than nothing... but ok, I'll beautify it.
On May 9, 2011, at 13:47, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 18:20:17 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
wrote:
This was previously computed but never passed on to the caller.
Found-by: clang static analyzer
Hi,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:34:09PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Sorry I'm late but:
Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org (05/05/2011):
Replace:
for (stuff; things; etc) {
if (misc || other) {
[...]
}
}
with:
for (stuff; things; etc) {
This was previously computed but never passed on to the caller.
Found-by: clang static analyzer
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com
---
configure.ac |2 +-
main.c| 83 +++--
rendercheck.h |5 +++-
tests.c
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:16:38PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
On 05/03/2011 03:00 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Some more documentation would have helped, I found it hard to get the big
picture in my head even with the wiki page. There are too many details that
weren't clear immediately and
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:38:00AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Most IR/RF remotes differ from normal keyboards in that they don't
provide release events. They do provide native repeat events, though.
Currently the Linux kernel RC/input subsystems provide a simulated
autorepeat for
On 10.05.2011 07:11, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:38:00AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Most IR/RF remotes differ from normal keyboards in that they don't
provide release events. They do provide native repeat events, though.
Currently the Linux kernel RC/input
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:14:30AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
On 10.05.2011 07:11, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:38:00AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Most IR/RF remotes differ from normal keyboards in that they don't
provide release events. They do provide
NOPUTENV was never defined in a modular build, probably because putenv()
is a standard function in Unix98 / SUSv2.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
---
src/util.c | 66
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 66
21 matches
Mail list logo
