Re: Debugging keyboard overlay+xbindkeys
> Question is, was it there for 22 years cause it's unfixable or because > nobody uses overlay? :) I guess Mihail is right, overlays are certainly little used. I do use overlays myself, but only as as lock, where the bug is not likely to occur. You might want to look at Redirect actions, another XKB feature that allows to pretend to applications that another key than the physical one has been pressed. They are more flexible than overlays, and they work fine. Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Debugging keyboard overlay+xbindkeys
> - press caps > - press f > - release caps > - wait > - release f In xserver/xkb/xkbPrKeyEv.c, there is a bug that prevents key press/release to be tracked properly for keys with overlays, in case such a key is down while the overlay state changes. There is even a comment (from 9/11/94) that mentions the problem. Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH] kbproto: Fix typo in XkbSARedirectSetVMods
And it uses vmods1 in place of vmods_mask1 Where? But I think there is still a bug: High and low bytes for virtual modifiers and masks are swapped, compared to the XKB protocol specification (the protocol uses big endian, the macros use little endian). Is this worth fixing? Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
[PATCH] kbproto: Fix typo in XkbSARedirectSetVMods
An apparent copy/paste bug in the macro XkbSARedirectSetVMods, which breaks
using RedirectKey actions with virtual modifiers.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Wettstein wetts...@gmail.com
---
XKBstr.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/XKBstr.h b/XKBstr.h
index 5a0c596..403c002 100644
--- a/XKBstr.h
+++ b/XKBstr.h
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ typedef struct _XkbRedirectKeyAction {
#defineXkbSARedirectVMods(a) unsigned
int)(a)-vmods1)8)|\
((unsigned int)(a)-vmods0))
-#defineXkbSARedirectSetVMods(a,m)
(((a)-vmods_mask1=(((m)8)0xff)),\
-((a)-vmods_mask0=((m)0xff)))
+#defineXkbSARedirectSetVMods(a,m) (((a)-vmods1=(((m)8)0xff)),\
+((a)-vmods0=((m)0xff)))
#defineXkbSARedirectVModsMask(a) unsigned
int)(a)-vmods_mask1)8)|\
((unsigned int)(a)-vmods_mask0))
#defineXkbSARedirectSetVModsMask(a,m)
(((a)-vmods_mask1=(((m)8)0xff)),\
--
2.2.1
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
xkbcomp: Please merge a reviewed patch
Dear all, A while ago, I submitted the following patch for xkbcomp, related to locking and ISOLock: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20376/ It has been reviewed, but not merged yet. Can somebody please merge this patch? Apart from fixing incorrect behaviour, this patch brings the foundations do address bug #56491 (for xkeyboard-config). Thank you, Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
libxkbfile: Please merge three reviewed patches
Dear all, some time ago I submitted the following three patches for libxkbfile: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20377/ http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20378/ http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20379/ They have been reviewed, but not merged. The first two add missing output of flags, the last one fixes a typo. Can someone please merge those patches? Thank you, Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
xkb xserver: Please merge reviewed patches
Dear all, a while ago, I submitted a few patches which have been reviewed, but not merged. These two add missing flags to output: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20380/ http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20381/ This one disables autorepeat for modifier keys (current autorepeat behaviour is incorrect): http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20382/ This one prevents emulated mouse button key presses suppressing other keys: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20384/ Finally, this one adds NoLock/NoUnlock support for LockControls: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/20724/ Can someone please merge these patches? Thank you, Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Please help with bug fix
It seems that mailing list x...@listserv.bat.ru doesn't exist anymore. Right. It moved to Google Groups: https://groups.google.com/a/listserv.bat.ru/group/xkb Everything that happens in bugzilla for xkeyboard-config is forwarded to this list, and little else is going on on this list besides that. Therefore, if you you feel your bug is ignored, just add another comment to your bug as a reminder. But please remember, you cannot expect a reaction in 24h, this is a volunteer's project.. Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: Odd compose key behaviour
compose(A) produces Ă) instead of Ⓐ With the libX11 compose, I get Ⓐ. With the GTK compose mechanism, I get Ă) as you observed. So my guess is that you accidentially use GTK's or some other input method, rather than XIM. Andreas ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
