On 03/31/14 02:21 AM, Michael Thayer wrote:
In MousePickProtocol() with protocol PROT_AUTO we probe for the protocol to
use but drop the result in most cases. This was causing DEVICE_INIT and
DEVICE_ON to fail to be called with the VUID protocol. Git history suggests
that this code was
On 04/11/14 12:53 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note not speaking on behalf of Peter here: IMHO it would be best if those people
who still need / depend on xf86-input-mouse would pick up the maintenance of it.
We do - as that would be me for Solaris, and the BSD people I mentioned earlier.
Peter
No response on this yet. Who would be the right person for looking at
patches to xf86-input-mouse? I do realise that it is no longer as
widely used as it once was...
Regards,
Michael
On 31/03/14 11:21, Michael Thayer wrote:
In MousePickProtocol() with protocol PROT_AUTO we probe for the
On 04/10/14 07:20 AM, Michael Thayer wrote:
No response on this yet. Who would be the right person for looking at patches
to xf86-input-mouse? I do realise that it is no longer as widely used as it
once was...
Occasionally the BSD folks will pipe in, but mostly it's been Peter Hutterer
and
In MousePickProtocol() with protocol PROT_AUTO we probe for the protocol to
use but drop the result in most cases. This was causing DEVICE_INIT and
DEVICE_ON to fail to be called with the VUID protocol. Git history suggests
that this code was originally meant to cover both PS/2 auto-detection
In MousePickProtocol() with protocol PROT_AUTO we probe for the protocol to
use but drop the result in most cases. This was causing DEVICE_INIT and
DEVICE_ON to fail to be called with the VUID protocol. Git history suggests
that this code was originally meant to cover both PS/2 auto-detection
