Grrr. Still wrong mailing list.
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de ____ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ m...@mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R D www.mshopf.de
---BeginMessage---
On Mar 24, 10 13:25:13 +0200,
Hi Matthias,
The following patch fixes Novell bug 568811:
VNC Installation aborts right in the middle due to an assertion in
Xvnc/libpixman
The bug seems occur only on *very* special occasions (in this case, only
in SLES, but *not* in SLED, which is based on the same code basis...).
On Mar 24, 10 18:28:07 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Please note that while pixman is not as strict as the X server in who
can push to the repository, it is not a complete free-for-all.
Committing small, obvious patches that fixes typos or oversights is
fine, but don't commit non-obvious stuff
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de writes:
This patch in particular, I don't think shold ship with no testing at
all. So please revert it, and we can consider it again for 0.19.x.
I'm fine with that if you consider it problematic. Given that the
situation it changes should actually not occur at
On Mar 24, 10 19:19:15 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
However, what happens if the code would have been compiled with -NDEBUG?
Is the code path stable with empty regions? If it is, it can be argued
that the patch is not necessary, but it could also be argued that the
assert() shouldn't have
Matthias Hopf mh...@suse.de writes:
On Mar 24, 10 19:19:15 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
However, what happens if the code would have been compiled with -NDEBUG?
Is the code path stable with empty regions? If it is, it can be argued
that the patch is not necessary, but it could also be
