Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:40:32 +0800 Jonas Ådahl wrote: > This E-mail is quite long, but I tried to reply to some parts. Hi Jonas, Olivier, appreciated. :-) TL;DR, I don't think there is anything in this email that would actually be an opposition to the xdg-output protocol

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

This E-mail is quite long, but I tried to reply to some parts. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:07:29PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 04:21:57 -0400 (EDT) > Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > Hi Pekka, > > > > > it's very hard for me to wrap my head around this,

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 04:21:57 -0400 (EDT) Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > it's very hard for me to wrap my head around this, so the below may > > sound a bit harsh, sorry. I don't mean to rant, but I feel there is > > something fundamental amiss. I am diving back

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

Hi Pekka, > it's very hard for me to wrap my head around this, so the below may > sound a bit harsh, sorry. I don't mean to rant, but I feel there is > something fundamental amiss. I am diving back into the high-level > design which is fairly separated from the xdg_output interface. No worries,

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

Hi Olivier, it's very hard for me to wrap my head around this, so the below may sound a bit harsh, sorry. I don't mean to rant, but I feel there is something fundamental amiss. I am diving back into the high-level design which is fairly separated from the xdg_output interface. On Thu, 6 Jul 2017

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

Hi Pekka, > I think I can offer only mostly mechanical comments, as I am still > quite confused about how this will actually be used. Well, for now, it will be used by Xwayland, might be of some interest for other clients who might need to know about the output "logical" size (e.g. screencast

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:13:43 +0200 Olivier Fourdan wrote: > This protocol aims at describing outputs in way which is more in line > with the concept of an output on desktop oriented systems. > > Some information are more specific to the concept of an output for a > desktop

[RFC PATCH v2] Add xdg-output protocol

This protocol aims at describing outputs in way which is more in line with the concept of an output on desktop oriented systems. Some information are more specific to the concept of an output for a desktop oriented system and may not make sense in other applications, such as IVI systems for