Before we change the state (e.g. adding a mode or applying one to an
output), we query the screen resources for the right identifiers. This
should only use the current information rather than force a reprobe on
all hardware - not only can that reprobe be very slow (e.g. EDID
timeouts on the order
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 12:14:57PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Seems you already can get the behaviour you want by specifying
> > --current. Whereas there is no convenient way to force a probe, other
> > than an explicit query?
>
> From: Chris Wilson
> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:40:37 +0100
>
> Before we change the state (e.g. adding a mode or applying one to an
> output), we query the screen resources for the right identifiers. This
> should only use the current information rather than force a
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson
> > Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:40:37 +0100
> >
> > Before we change the state (e.g. adding a mode or applying one to an
> > output), we query the screen resources for the right
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 08:01:46PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:14:57 +0100
> > From: Chris Wilson
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > From: Chris Wilson
> > > > Date:
> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:14:57 +0100
> From: Chris Wilson
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:08:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > From: Chris Wilson
> > > Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:40:37 +0100
> > >
> > > Before we change the state (e.g.