Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-16 Thread Keith Packard
Hans de Goede writes: Looks like all of these have been merged, thanks for tracking what remained to be done! > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/106849/ > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/106850/ > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/105350/ >

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-15 Thread Aaron Plattner
On 09/13/2016 10:27 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 09.09.2016 20:18, Aaron Plattner wrote: On 09/06/2016 12:27 PM, Keith Packard wrote: Adam Jackson writes: ... move the non-critical bug deadline to 2016-10-01? Still leaves three weeks for critical fixes. Either way, looks

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-14 Thread Keith Packard
Keith Packard writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get > 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. > > I'd like to propose that we figure out what remaining non-bug changes > we'd like to

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 09.09.2016 20:18, Aaron Plattner wrote: > On 09/06/2016 12:27 PM, Keith Packard wrote: >> Adam Jackson writes: >> >>> ... move the non-critical bug deadline to 2016-10-01? Still leaves >>> three weeks for critical fixes. Either way, looks plausible to me. I >>> don't personally

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-09 Thread Aaron Plattner
On 09/06/2016 12:27 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > Adam Jackson writes: > >> ... move the non-critical bug deadline to 2016-10-01? Still leaves >> three weeks for critical fixes. Either way, looks plausible to me. I >> don't personally have any non-bug changes I want to land before

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-08 Thread Laércio de Sousa
Please consider reviewing my latest Xephyr patches (at least the latest one - I'm afraid things may break in Xephyr running in mui-seat mode after Keith's new event-handling API): https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/89109/ https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/89110/

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-06 Thread Keith Packard
Adam Jackson writes: > ... move the non-critical bug deadline to 2016-10-01? Still leaves > three weeks for critical fixes. Either way, looks plausible to me. I > don't personally have any non-bug changes I want to land before 1.19. Yeah, sounds good. We don't usually get many

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-06 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 00:33 -0500,  > Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get > 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. > > I'd like to propose that we figure out what remaining non-bug changes > we'd like to get merged in the next week (or two?),

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06-09-16 05:23, Keith Packard wrote: Hans de Goede writes: That is quick :) Fine by me, but I've a whole bunch of modesetting / prime patches (all bugfixes really) I would like to get in before then. As you can see, bug fixes are welcome until 9-24. All that

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 02/09/16 02:33 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > > Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get > 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment! > I'd like to propose that we figure out what remaining non-bug changes

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:18:24AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-09-16 07:33, Keith Packard wrote: > > > > Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get > > 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. > > > > I'd like to propose that we

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-05 Thread Keith Packard
Hans de Goede writes: > That is quick :) Fine by me, but I've a whole bunch of > modesetting / prime patches (all bugfixes really) I would like to get in > before then. As you can see, bug fixes are welcome until 9-24. All that closes 9-10 is new feature development. If

Re: Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-04 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02-09-16 07:33, Keith Packard wrote: Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. I'd like to propose that we figure out what remaining non-bug changes we'd like to get merged in the next week (or

Proposed X server 1.19 schedule

2016-09-03 Thread "Keith Packard"
Following the 'release early and often' mantra, we should probably get 1.19 out the door and let people start using the new code. I'd like to propose that we figure out what remaining non-bug changes we'd like to get merged in the next week (or two?), then move into a non-critical bug fix period