From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
After we swap the axes, we only call valuator_mask_set for axes that are
not zero, so we need to unset the axes that became zero when swapped.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
---
src/evdev.c |4
1 files changed, 4
Hi
2011/12/14 Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com:
Would it be better to remove the evdev axis swap property?
If we still want it around, it would probably be easier to have it set
the transformation matrix under the covers. It would make the
transformation matrix and evdev axis
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
+static void
+TouchAddActiveGrabListener(DeviceIntPtr dev, TouchPointInfoPtr ti,
+ InternalEvent *ev, GrabPtr grab)
+{
+if (!ti-emulate_pointer
+(grab-grabtype == CORE || grab-grabtype == XI))
+
Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
---
specs/XI2proto.txt |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/specs/XI2proto.txt b/specs/XI2proto.txt
index 8b79210..46895d8 100644
--- a/specs/XI2proto.txt
+++ b/specs/XI2proto.txt
@@ -2390,7 +2390,7 @@ require the
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
+void
+TouchListenerGone(XID resource)
+{
+TouchPointInfoPtr ti;
+DeviceIntPtr dev;
+InternalEvent *events = InitEventList(GetMaximumEventsNum());
Forgot to deallocate the event list.
+int i, j, k, nev;
+
+if (!events)
On 12/08/2011 07:04 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:50:33 +1000, Peter Huttererpeter.hutte...@who-t.net
wrote:
dix: switch the syncEvent queue to a struct list
This exposes PlayReleasedEvents as a global function (for testing),
From: Vic Lee ll...@163.com
Modified from Vic's original patch to make Xephyr always be resizeable,
instead of only if embedded in something else.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25804
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Vic Lee ll...@163.com
---
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:45:02 -0500, Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca wrote:
which was added in commit:
dmx: Build fix for -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
Merged.
f7ea7a3..2c1d0a5 master - master
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgphpRmdfVa1g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:07:54PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
---
specs/XI2proto.txt |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/specs/XI2proto.txt b/specs/XI2proto.txt
index 8b79210..46895d8 100644
---
For future touch points, we need positionSprite to calculate the coordinates
but we don't want to actually change the cursor position for non-emulating
touches.
No functional changes at this point.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
Changes to v1:
- instead of an update
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:40:48PM -0200, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
+static void
+TouchAddActiveGrabListener(DeviceIntPtr dev, TouchPointInfoPtr ti,
+ InternalEvent *ev, GrabPtr grab)
+{
+if
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:41:39PM -0200, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
+void
+TouchListenerGone(XID resource)
+{
+TouchPointInfoPtr ti;
+DeviceIntPtr dev;
+InternalEvent *events = InitEventList(GetMaximumEventsNum());
Forgot
Welp, I'm happy!
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:28:31AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
For future touch points, we need positionSprite to calculate the coordinates
but we don't want to actually change the cursor position for non-emulating
touches.
No
I pushed this as commit 87e10a7b9a97c951ab4d477f6119ac0a6a66.
One of the comments in the bugz Jamey suggested that an async reply
handler, but given that such a patch hasn't appeared in the half-decade
since he opened bugz 9120, it seems reasonable to push the fix we have
until and unless
If the device is mapped 3 2 1, a click on physical button 1 sends a button 3
press, but the state was set for button 1. Fix this, the state must be set
for that button's logical mapping.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655928
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:26:37PM -0200, przan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
After we swap the axes, we only call valuator_mask_set for axes that are
not zero, so we need to unset the axes that became zero when swapped.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:33:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Hi
2011/12/14 Chase Douglas chase.doug...@canonical.com:
Would it be better to remove the evdev axis swap property?
If we still want it around, it would probably be easier to have it set
the transformation matrix under the
17 matches
Mail list logo
