I sent the exact same patch a few years ago. Was enough to create an
interesting thread.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-December/041802.html
2011/4/6 Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com:
Signed-off-by: Timo Aaltonen timo.aalto...@canonical.com
---
src/sis_driver.c | 8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/sis_driver.c b/src/sis_driver.c
index 8ce1cdd..337bba6 100644
--- a/src/sis_driver.c
+++ b/src/sis_driver.c
@@ -403,14 +403,14 @@ SISErrorLog(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, const char *format, ...)
static const char *str =
**\n;
va_start(ap, format);
- xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR, str);
+ xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR, %s, str);
xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
ERROR:\n);
xf86VDrvMsgVerb(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR, 1, format, ap);
va_end(ap);
xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
END OF MESSAGE\n);
- xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR, str);
+ xf86DrvMsg(pScrn-scrnIndex, X_ERROR, %s, str);
}
static void
@@ -1888,14 +1888,14 @@ SiSUpdateXineramaScreenInfo(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn1)
if(infochanged !usenonrect) {
xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
Virtual screen size does not match maximum display
modes...\n);
- xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO, rectxine);
+ xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO, %s, rectxine);
}
} else if(infochanged usenonrect) {
usenonrect = FALSE;
xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
Only clone modes available for this virtual screen
size...\n);
- xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO, rectxine);
+ xf86DrvMsg(pScrn1-scrnIndex, X_INFO, %s, rectxine);
}
if(pSiS-maxCRT1_X1) { /* Means we have at least one
non-clone mode */
--
1.7.4.1
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel