Re: [PATCH] dix: a valuator count of 0 is valid (#34510)
On 21.02.2011 07:39, Peter Hutterer wrote: For all but motion and proximity events, having no valuators is ok. Regression from 1.9, keyboard events are not converted to protocol events. X.Org Bug 34510 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34510 Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net Thanks! Mumble works now. Tested-by: Timo Aaltonen timo.aalto...@canonical.com ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH] dix: a valuator count of 0 is valid (#34510)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:39:17 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: For all but motion and proximity events, having no valuators is ok. Regression from 1.9, keyboard events are not converted to protocol events. Looks right to me. Reviewed-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpCeZhC1FEGo.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
Re: [PATCH] dix: a valuator count of 0 is valid (#34510)
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:39:17PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: For all but motion and proximity events, having no valuators is ok. Regression from 1.9, keyboard events are not converted to protocol events. X.Org Bug 34510 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34510 Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
