Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes: > This is a step towards making libglamor_egl and Xwayland not link > against libGL (which brings in client-side libraries, which is just > icky).
Is it actually necessary? Given that the epoxy GLX symbols always exist, and we're linking against epoxy, it seems like we could just drop our -lGL. libglamor_egl should pretty clearly not be linking to libGL, though, so I'm in favor of following where this leads.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
