Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Jonas, > > > I would prefer leaning towards just making the compositors more > > > considerate about their Xwayland configuration. I believe the global > > > trend is to move towards the compositor having all the configurability > > > in itself, and all the other components having a single

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:47:10AM -0500, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > > configuration bypass. > > True. > > > I would prefer leaning towards just

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 05:47:10 -0500 (EST) Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > > configuration bypass. > > True. > > > I would prefer

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Pekka, > I understand the attractiveness of adding an override, bypassing the > compositors like this. But, essentially it is just that: a > configuration bypass. True. > I would prefer leaning towards just making the compositors more > considerate about their Xwayland configuration. I

Re: [RFC PATCH xserver] xwayland: RFC Disable glamor with an env var?

2017-03-02 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:45:11 +0100 Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi all, > > I am seeing quite a few Xwayland crashes related to glamor. > > Various issues, could be with glamor itself or with the drivers (like the > issues I witness with nv30), whatever. > > To investigate