[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:02 PST --- Created an attachment (id=9932) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9932&action=view) Error Make Mesa 3D -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.o

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 13:01 PST --- > I don't know further options other than to leave the 3D disabled or try the > latest development versions in case you want to provide further information on > whether th

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 10:48 PST --- > Does the problem also happen without Option "GARTSize"? > I have try to uncomment Option "GARTSize" but I have a crash too -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.fr

Re: DRI on dual-head: what's needed?

2007-05-11 Thread Alex Deucher
On 5/11/07, Nemosoft Unv. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Friday 11 May 2007 10:51, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On 5/10/07, Nemosoft Unv. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've got myself a dual-head setup here with a card based on a Radeon 9200 > > > SE, XOrg 7.2 (the rele

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 07:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #14) > I would guess that the third one (the normal DDX video driver) is not needed > since this is DRI related. DRI issues can be caused by the DDX

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9885|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9886|application/x-trash |text/plain mime type|

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI crashes with DRI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ATI (HIS) Graphic Card |ATI (HIS) Graphic Card

Re: DRI on dual-head: what's needed?

2007-05-11 Thread Nemosoft Unv.
Hello, On Friday 11 May 2007 10:51, Alex Deucher wrote: > On 5/10/07, Nemosoft Unv. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got myself a dual-head setup here with a card based on a Radeon 9200 > > SE, XOrg 7.2 (the release, not the latest code), which works fine. > > However, when start

Re: DRI on dual-head: what's needed?

2007-05-11 Thread Nemosoft Unv.
Hello, On Friday 11 May 2007 06:38, Leoncio Juan Ernesto López (Cholo) wrote: > On 5/10/07, Nemosoft Unv. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've got myself a dual-head setup here with a card based on a Radeon 9200 > > SE, XOrg 7.2 (the release, not the latest code), which works fine. >

[Bug 10874] ATI (HIS) Graphic Card Radeon 9250 PCI

2007-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10874 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-11 05:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Have you a other proposition ? > > 1. Did you try to comment out the Option "dri" line from Section "Module"? >

Re: DRI on dual-head: what's needed?

2007-05-11 Thread Alex Deucher
On 5/10/07, Nemosoft Unv. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I've got myself a dual-head setup here with a card based on a Radeon 9200 SE, > XOrg 7.2 (the release, not the latest code), which works fine. However, when > starting up X, I get this message in the log: > > (II) RADEON(0): initiali