[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #7 from Bryan Stillwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 17:20:03 PST --- $ gdb xrandr GNU gdb 6.7.1-debian Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 16:56:08 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > However, if I run xrandr outright it segfaults: Can you get a decent backtrace? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/

[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #5 from Bryan Stillwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 16:10:19 PST --- Alex, I found that if I modified xrandr.c and replaced the following line with a return statement, I could use xrandr to configure a dual-head display: fata

[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Stillwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 13:08:24 PST --- Created an attachment (id=13865) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13865) Log file from running X on the N610c w/ today's (2008-01-22) git s

[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 12:59:33 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Alex, > > I tried the latest source code from the git tree and it doesn't help. Can you attach the xorg log? > > $ ls -l /usr/lib/

[Bug 14128] Unable to use xrandr to go dual-head

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14128 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Stillwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 12:46:25 PST --- Alex, I tried the latest source code from the git tree and it doesn't help. $ ls -l /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 51944 20

Bug#461649: Image shakes and shivers when content changes with Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE)

Hi, Michel. Things are working better. Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:08 -0500, Stephen Benoit (Linux) wrote: >> >> 1. Tests under xserver-xorg unstable: >> >> At first, I had the shaking/shivering problem under load, but it was >> less >> pronounced (about 1-2 pixel horizontal

[Bug 14203] 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13864|application/octet-stream|text/plain mi

[Bug 14203] 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13863|text/x-log |text/plain mi

[Bug 14203] 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 --- Comment #3 from Jan Willies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 09:26:40 PST --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ xrandr --verbose -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2720 x 900, maximum 2720 x 900 VGA-0 disconnected 1440x900+1280+0 (0x78) normal (nor

[Bug 14203] 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 --- Comment #2 from Jan Willies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 09:25:20 PST --- Created an attachment (id=13864) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13864) xorg.conf -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpref

[Bug 14203] 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 --- Comment #1 from Jan Willies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 09:24:54 PST --- Created an attachment (id=13863) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13863) Xorg.0.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpre

[Bug 14203] New: 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14203 Summary: 60wakeups/second after activating second TFT Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug 13960] ati driver on a radeon 9250 causes weird overlaying, flipping, etc.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960 --- Comment #10 from Dennis Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 08:48:58 PST --- (From update of attachment 13860) There are dbus and hal problems you can ignore. Hal crashes since the new release and there's no new release out yet. -- Co

[Bug 13960] ati driver on a radeon 9250 causes weird overlaying, flipping, etc.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960 --- Comment #9 from Dennis Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-22 08:42:49 PST --- Created an attachment (id=13860) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13860) trying out if attaching works now Benjamin Close asked me if attachi

Re: ATI drivers and Mac Power PC

On Jan 22, 2008 5:37 AM, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 18:12 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:15:29PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On Jan 20, 2008 7:07 AM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008

Bug#461649: Image shakes and shivers when content changes with Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE)

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 19:08 -0500, Stephen Benoit (Linux) wrote: > > 1. Tests under xserver-xorg unstable: > > At first, I had the shaking/shivering problem under load, but it was less > pronounced (about 1-2 pixel horizontal movement). Settings that seem to > help: > > Option "SWCursor" "on"

[Bug 13737] XVideo renders RGB image incorrectry.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13737 Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

Re: ATI drivers and Mac Power PC

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 18:12 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:15:29PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2008 7:07 AM, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:39:56PM -0800, R.C. wrote: > > > > Does anyone know of a way to run L