[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2019-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 Martin Peres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #24 from Lizzi Swane --- Yup. The amdgpu driver doesn't support my beaver creek apu On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:47 PM, wrote: > Michel Dänzer changed bug

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #22 from Michel Dänzer --- Beware that the amdgpu kernel driver currently has issues with GPU scaling, see bug 95131. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Driver/AMDgpu |Driver/Radeon ---

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #21 from Lizzi Swane --- I'm very tired. I need to take a break. Even the native resolution for my laptoop and the monitor im using arent available with the opensource driver. Thank you for your help. --

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #20 from Lizzi Swane --- sorry about that last post. I'm fatigued. xrandr --newmode "1368x768_60.00" 85.25 1368 1440 1576 1784 768 771 781 798 -hsync +vsync xrandr --addmode HDMI-0 "1368x768_60.00" xrandr

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #19 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Lizzi Swane from comment #18) > xrandr --addmode HDMI-0 "1366x768_59.94" > xrandr: cannot find mode "1366x768_59.94" > > xrandr --addmode HDMI-0 "1366x768_60" > xrandr:

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #18 from Lizzi Swane --- xrandr --addmode HDMI-0 "1366x768_59.94" xrandr: cannot find mode "1366x768_59.94" xrandr --addmode HDMI-0 "1366x768_60" xrandr: cannot find mode "1366x768_60" cvt 1366 768 # 1368x768

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #17 from Lizzi Swane --- Also trying to adjust the scaling mode from the default of none gives me a blank screen, regardless of wheter i have underscan set to off or on with the opensource driver. -- You are

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #16 from Lizzi Swane --- Yes that's correct, catalyst doesn't see the 1366x768 either but it does offer me other resolutions which are useful to me and i would like the same available from the opensource

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #15 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Lizzi Swane from comment #14) > so what can i do? Catalyst/fglrx has some notion of it in spite of the edid > not reporting all it's modes. How does catalyst do that

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #14 from Lizzi Swane --- so what can i do? Catalyst/fglrx has some notion of it in spite of the edid not reporting all it's modes. How does catalyst do that when the opensource driver can not? -- You are

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #13 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Lizzi Swane from comment #12) > Even catalyst doesn't see it as a viable resolution for 1366x768 The monitor announces all modes that it supports via the EDID. If it's

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #12 from Lizzi Swane --- Even catalyst doesn't see it as a viable resolution for 1366x768 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher --- Turn off underscan if you want to use scaling. Also, underscan compensates for overscan applied by the TV so you'll end up getting scaled twice (once by the GPU and once by the TV).

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #10 from Lizzi Swane --- You know what's funny is that i have seen the specs for the tv and see that 1366x768 is the default resolution for the tv. Also for this laptop that was the default resoultion for the

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #9 from Lizzi Swane --- When the system boots, it boots into 1920x1080. if i use then the xrandr to set underscan to on the desktop size is still greater than the viewable area. With underscan off the best

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #8 from Lizzi Swane --- the open source drive default scaling mode is none. Also catalyst uses 30hz not 60hz for the resolutions above 1280x720 and when i tried to use those with the opensource driver i get a

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #7 from Lizzi Swane --- I have tried that several times and i get a blank screen with the opensource driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher --- The TV does not appear to support 1600x900. I think catalyst must add it as a "fake" scaled mode. You can enable scaling in the open source driver by setting: xrandr --output HDMI-0

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #5 from Lizzi Swane --- Also when i used graphics scaling with the catalyst i had to set underscan to 7% at 1600x900 30hz under maintain aspect ratio. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #4 from Lizzi Swane --- Also i went back to the catalyst driver to see what it does differently that i haven't tried and it uses for 1600x900 a 30htz refresh rate but also it uses monitor scaling and not gpu

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #3 from Lizzi Swane --- sudo dmesg | pastebinit http://pastebin.com/NFj3TMWV xrandr --verbose http://pastebin.com/YeCKkpDs cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | pastebinit http://pastebin.com/CiEL6t9k xrandr -q

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does does

2016-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher --- Please attach your xorg log and dmesg output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ xorg-driver-ati

[Bug 95320] Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does does

2016-05-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320 --- Comment #1 from Lizzi Swane --- 6520g APU Beavercreek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list