Hi,
> Fabian is back!
\o/
>> On 04/02/16 14:49, Fabian Greif wrote:
>>> To solve these issues a possible solution is extract the system
builder
>>> part of the SCons system (basically everything in /architecture) into
a
>>> separate tool and make the remaining parts more modular. One approach
>>
Fabian is back!
> On 04/02/16 14:49, Fabian Greif wrote:
>> To solve these issues a possible solution is extract the system builder
>> part of the SCons system (basically everything in /architecture) into a
>> separate tool and make the remaining parts more modular. One approach for
>> this would
Hi Fabian,
thank you for your efforts.
On 04/02/16 14:49, Fabian Greif wrote:
To solve these issues a possible solution is extract the system builder
part of the SCons system (basically everything in /architecture) into a
separate tool and make the remaining parts more modular. One approach for
Hi,
during the last developer meeting we had some discussions about the next
steps for xpcc.
In my opinion one of the main problems in using xpcc for bigger projects
is its build system. Although I like SCons and and implemented its
beginning in xpcc, it has grown to much into a system builder. T
