Re: [Fonts]Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-30 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Dr Andrew C Aitchison writes: AA> I thought (hoped?) that the scalable font renderers could cope with AA> unusual dot pitches. The scalable renderers will indeed handle reasonable font pitches fine. The only issue I can see is the one of delta hints in TrueType fonts. Delta hints apply to one

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-26 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > On Monday 26 November 2001 00:14, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > > > The program i used to see what dpi i was at was xdpyinfo.the fonts > > > may have been at a correct resolution, but since the display wasn't it > > > l

Re: [Fonts]Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-26 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Keith Packard wrote: > Once you start with this postulate, the logical consequence is that the > effective angular size of the pixel depends solely on the number of pixels > on the screen. I don't know whether this depends on the horizontal or > vertical size, but the ever

Re: [Fonts]Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-26 Thread Keith Packard
Around 15 o'clock on Nov 26, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > Come to that, there is no good reason why the average application > should be using fonts where it matters. If I have two 1024x768 displays, > one a 14" laptop and the other a 50" plasma display, I usually want the > text to be the same

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-26 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Andy Isaacson wrote: > I think Mark's idea of snapping to 75 or 100 DPI is a good one, but I'd > say that this should only be done if the delta is less than... 15% > maybe. Perhaps there should be standard values at 125 and 150 as well, > since some systems are starting to c

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-26 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:40:25AM -0500, safemode wrote: > unless 1280x1024 dimensions gives 87x96 resolution, then it was wrong. If it "How long is a piece of string?" The resolution depends on the monitor size. XFree86 put the values it used to calculate that resolution in the log file (/v

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread safemode
On Monday 26 November 2001 00:14, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > > The program i used to see what dpi i was at was xdpyinfo.the fonts > > may have been at a correct resolution, but since the display wasn't it > > looked all sorts of messed up. The problem here

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > The program i used to see what dpi i was at was xdpyinfo.the fonts may > have been at a correct resolution, but since the display wasn't it looked all > sorts of messed up. The problem here isn't with end user apps. Something > was not being detect

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread safemode
On Sunday 25 November 2001 23:22, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > [Mark Vojkovich] > > > It's not probed via DDC. The monitor size is, and a DPI > > calculation is made from that and the resolution, which of course, > > makes no sense at all for virtual desktops. > > The X server knows th

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
[Mark Vojkovich] > It's not probed via DDC. The monitor size is, and a DPI > calculation is made from that and the resolution, which of course, > makes no sense at all for virtual desktops. The X server knows the largest physical resolution. Snap the DPI to 100 or 75, whichever is cl

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2001 17:59, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 08:34, safemode wrote: > > > On Sunday 25 November 2001 02:18, safemode wrote: > > > > for some reason it's defaulting to resolution:87x96 dots per inch > > > > i'm going t

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread safemode
On Sunday 25 November 2001 17:59, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 08:34, safemode wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2001 02:18, safemode wrote: > > > for some reason it's defaulting to resolution:87x96 dots per inch > > > i'm going to try running at 100x100 and see if that fixes t

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-25 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 08:34, safemode wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2001 02:18, safemode wrote: > > > > for some reason it's defaulting to resolution:87x96 dots per inch > > i'm going to try running at 100x100 and see if that fixes things > > Yes, this fixed things for 4.1.0.1. I have no i

Re: [Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-24 Thread safemode
On Sunday 25 November 2001 02:18, safemode wrote: > I seem to be having an issue with fonts with both X 4.1.0.1 and 4.1.99.x . > In the CVS of X, i cant get the fixed fonts to work at all. When i get an > alias to work for the fixed font on some other font, it says my cursor font > is unloadabl

[Xpert]X cvs has a problem with the fixed font?

2001-11-24 Thread safemode
I seem to be having an issue with fonts with both X 4.1.0.1 and 4.1.99.x . In the CVS of X, i cant get the fixed fonts to work at all. When i get an alias to work for the fixed font on some other font, it says my cursor font is unloadable. I have no idea why because it's there. No compil