Hi,
The blogsphere is a buzz to discuss the question "Is
Mozilla XU Development too hard?".
Dan comments:
Its not too hard. They just dont know that it
exists. If theyve heard of XUL, they think its
Netscapes proprietary DHTML stuff. Its a PR problem.
Neil Deakin (of XUL Pla
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:05:55AM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote :
> Ken Walker writes in his blog story:
[shortened Ken Walkers blog]
> [...] What I didn?t
> see (as a browser end user) was that the entire
> browser itself was being rendered with the Gecko
> engine?a clever, intuitive application f
Connecting XUL with a more flexible language such as PHP is also very hard. When I first started out on my journey to find a way to accomplish this, I ran into a number of problems. It was after a great deal of searching, reading some hard to find list posts, and a great deal of experimentation I
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 20:51, Mike Hostetler wrote:
> Connecting XUL with a more flexible language such as
> PHP is also very hard.
That's one of the things that the project I work on addresses - it
mandates UI and application separation where the UI is in XWT's form of
(don't sue me) XUL and the a
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:31:18PM +, Charles Goodwin wrote :
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 20:51, Mike Hostetler wrote:
> > Connecting XUL with a more flexible language such as
> > PHP is also very hard.
>
> That's one of the things that the project I work on addresses - it
> mandates UI and appli
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 22:49, Markus Fischer wrote:
> I am not sure if I'm following this correctly; forgive me if not.
>
> The link would be to use the XmlHttpRequestObject [1] (sp?) when you
> start your (Mozilla) XUL application. You then send your GET/POST
> requests to the serv
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:31:18PM +, Charles Goodwin wrote :
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 20:51, Mike Hostetler wrote:
> > Connecting XUL with a more flexible language such as
> > PHP is also very hard.
>
> That's one of the things that the project I work on addresses - it
> mandates UI and appli
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:05:55AM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote :
> Ken Walker writes in his blog story:
[shortened Ken Walkers blog]
> [...] What I didn?t
> see (as a browser end user) was that the entire
> browser itself was being rendered with the Gecko
> engine?a clever, intuitive application f
> But I completely agree that a proper
> first-user friendly
> documentation is definitely missing.
Let's hope the new 800-page Mozilla XUL book by
Nigel McFarlane upcoming any minute now will break new
ground and fill the gap left by the last two XUL
books, that is, "Essential XUL Programming"
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:03:06PM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote :
> > But I completely agree that a proper
> > first-user friendly
> > documentation is definitely missing.
>
>Let's hope the new 800-page Mozilla XUL book by
> Nigel McFarlane upcoming any minute now will break new
> ground and fil
10 matches
Mail list logo
