Lasse,
Thanks for the update. Version 5.1.x is fine, I was not expecting it to be
released immediately. This should meet all the maintainer's requirements.
Have a great day, and thank you for all your help the past few days, I
really appreciate it.
Regards,
Tom
-Original Message-
From
On 2011-11-06 Tom Trauth wrote:
> From an e-mail from the maintainer, it looks like your proposal to
> add the minimum required version of xz-utils to the output of "xz
> -lvv" will be enough to meet his requirements. He wants to be able
> to check which version of xz he needs, and this will enabl
