On 2021-02-05 Brett Okken wrote:
> > > Now that there is a 6 byte chunkHeader, could the 1 byte tempBuf
> > > be removed?
> >
> > It's better to keep it. It would be confusing to use the same
> > buffer in write(int) and writeChunk(). At glance it would look like
> > that writeChunk() could be ov
> > Now that there is a 6 byte chunkHeader, could the 1 byte tempBuf be
> > removed?
>
> It's better to keep it. It would be confusing to use the same buffer in
> write(int) and writeChunk(). At glance it would look like that
> writeChunk() could be overwriting the input.
I assumed that lz.fillWin
On 2021-02-05 Brett Okken wrote:
> After recent changes, the LZMA2OutputStream class no longer uses
> DataOutputStream, but the import statement is still present.
Fixed. Thanks!
> Now that there is a 6 byte chunkHeader, could the 1 byte tempBuf be
> removed?
It's better to keep it. It would be c
After recent changes, the LZMA2OutputStream class no longer uses
DataOutputStream, but the import statement is still present.
Now that there is a 6 byte chunkHeader, could the 1 byte tempBuf be removed?
