(but are still waiting for merge). Should I add these things to only
my local version, or is there a plan for these things in the future?
--
Dennis Ens
more. Why not pass on
maintainership for XZ for C so you can give XZ for Java more
attention? Or pass on XZ for Java to someone else to focus on XZ for
C? Trying to maintain both means that neither are maintained well.
--
Dennis Ens
> Can this be taken up again?
+1
Any updates on this?
--
Dennis Ens
cv-lzma2-1.xz and good-1-riscv-lzma2-2.xz. These did seem to work
fine when I tried with xz, but not with xz-java. Do you think there might be a
fix available for this soon?
Thank you.
--
Dennis Ens
he speed of the Java version, or is c just a much more
efficient programming language?
Also, I noticed that the results of compressing the files were different sizes.
They both worked, so I don't know if it's an issue, but it does seem strange.
The xz-java one was slightly smaller than the xz one.
Thanks again for the help.
--
Dennis Ens
> I hope 1.10 could be done in a month or two but I don't want to make any
> promises or serious predictions. Historically those haven't been
> accurate at all.
I'll hope it's on the sooner side then. Is there a reason that xz-java is so
far behind its counterpart? It seems those filters have
