On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 03:10:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> @@ -5212,8 +5211,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
> struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
> struct list_head *pos, *next, reaplist;
> - time_t cutoff = get_seconds() -
On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 22:44 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:27 PM Hans Verkuil .nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/13/19 4:32 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > I've heard good things about the prebuilt toolchains
> > > > from http://musl.cc/.
> > > > These
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:45 PM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 23:17 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/ioctl.rst
> > +``include/uapi/asm-generic/ioctl.h`` provides four macros for defining
> > +ioctl commands that follow modern
[+cc cip-dev]
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 12:29 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
> - Users of CIP SLTS kernels with extreme service life that may involve
> not upgrading until after y2038 (this is obviously not recommended if
> you connect to a public network, but I'm sure some people do this
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:11 PM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 23:17 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -1710,6 +1711,38 @@ static int idecd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev,
> > fmode_t mode,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > +static int
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:46 PM Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >
> > I don't think there is a clear policy about being friendly to testing
> > less that master kernels in xfstest (Eryu?), but IMO we should try to
> > accommodate
> > this use
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:57 PM Ben Hutchings
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 23:16 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * CDROM ioctls are handled in the block layer, but
> > + * do the scsi blk ioctls here.
> > + */
> > + ret = scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl(bdev, mode,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:29:39PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:40 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:46 PM Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:40 AM Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:46 PM Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >
> > [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/futimens.html
>
> Ugh, that's a mess. Why not just use
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:46 PM Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >
> > I don't think there is a clear policy about being friendly to testing
> > less that master kernels in xfstest (Eryu?), but IMO we should try to
> > accommodate
> > this
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:46 PM Amir Goldstein wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a clear policy about being friendly to testing
> less that master kernels in xfstest (Eryu?), but IMO we should try to
> accommodate
> this use case, because it is in the best interest of everyone that stable
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
