On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:05 PM Darrick J. Wong
> > wrote:
> > What is the timeline for that work now? I'm mainly interested in
> > getting the removal of 'time_t/timeval/
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:05 PM Darrick J. Wong
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > When building a kernel that disables support for 32-bit time_t
> > > system calls, it also makes s
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:05 PM Darrick J. Wong
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > When building a kernel that disables support for 32-bit time_t
> > system calls, it also makes sense to disable the old xfs_bstat
> > ioctls completely, as they truncate t
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When building a kernel that disables support for 32-bit time_t
> system calls, it also makes sense to disable the old xfs_bstat
> ioctls completely, as they truncate the timestamps to 32-bit
> values.
Note that current xfs doesn't su
When building a kernel that disables support for 32-bit time_t
system calls, it also makes sense to disable the old xfs_bstat
ioctls completely, as they truncate the timestamps to 32-bit
values.
Any application using these needs to be updated to use the v5
interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
