On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:26:58PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> I thought we were using this to make uname print "riscv64" (or "riscv32")
>> instead of just "riscv"? Is there another mechanism to do that?
>
> That is set in the UTS_MAC
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:26:58PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I thought we were using this to make uname print "riscv64" (or "riscv32")
> instead of just "riscv"? Is there another mechanism to do that?
That is set in the UTS_MACHINE variable in arch/riscv/Makefile
and doesn't involve compat.h
On Fri, 06 Jul 2018 22:42:43 PDT (-0700), deepa.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
riscv does not enable CONFIG_COMPAT in default configurations:
defconfig, allmodconfig and allnoconfig.
Remove the asm/compat.h as it does not seem to add any value to
the architecture without CONFIG_COMPAT.
Now that time co
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 10:42:43PM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> riscv does not enable CONFIG_COMPAT in default configurations:
> defconfig, allmodconfig and allnoconfig.
> Remove the asm/compat.h as it does not seem to add any value to
> the architecture without CONFIG_COMPAT.
Looks good,
Revie
riscv does not enable CONFIG_COMPAT in default configurations:
defconfig, allmodconfig and allnoconfig.
Remove the asm/compat.h as it does not seem to add any value to
the architecture without CONFIG_COMPAT.
Now that time compat syscalls are being reused in non CONFIG_COMPAT
modes, asm-generic/com