On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Regarding the three versions, I think all of them are doable
> > doable, and they all have their upsides and downsides but no
> > showstoppers.
> >
> > Let me summarize what I see in the patches:
> >
> >
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Regarding the three versions, I think all of them are doable
> doable, and they all have their upsides and downsides but no
> showstoppers.
>
> Let me summarize what I see in the patches:
>
> 2a is the smallest set of changes in number of lines, as you
On Friday 12 February 2016 01:21:59 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Introduction
>
> This is a follow on to the series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/20 [1].
> This is aimed at reaching a consensus on how to transition the vfs
> timestamps to use 64 bit time. This demonstrates three ways (2a, 2b and
>
> Regarding the three versions, I think all of them are doable
> doable, and they all have their upsides and downsides but no
> showstoppers.
I agree that all the approaches are doable.
> Let me summarize what I see in the patches:
>
> 2a is the smallest set of changes in number of lines, as you
