On Thursday 22 October 2015 12:08:14 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>
> A couple of doubts I had while working on some patches.
Hi Amitoj,
I've put the y2038 and outreachy mailing lists on Cc, I hope that's
ok with you.
You ask good and important questions, and it will help others to
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 12:08:14 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>>
>> A couple of doubts I had while working on some patches.
>
> Hi Amitoj,
>
> I've put the y2038 and outreachy mailing lists on Cc, I hope that's
On Thursday 22 October 2015 09:43:25 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:03:02 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Yes, and that is the
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:03:02 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 15:17:14 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > Rename old ioctl and data types to COMPAT_USBTEST_REQUEST and
> > > usbtest_param_compat,
Change the 32-bit time type timeval to the 64-bit time type
ktime_t, since 32-bit systems using struct timeval will break in the
year 2038. Correspondingly change do_gettimeofday() to ktime_get()
since ktime_get returns a ktime_t, but do_gettimeofday returns a
struct timeval.
Signed-off-by:
On Thursday 22 October 2015 19:35:49 Shraddha Barke wrote:
> Change the 32-bit time type timeval to the 64-bit time type
> ktime_t, since 32-bit systems using struct timeval will break in the
> year 2038. Correspondingly change do_gettimeofday() to ktime_get()
> since ktime_get returns a ktime_t,
On Thursday 22 October 2015 20:02:59 Shraddha Barke wrote:
> Changes the 32-bit time type timeval to the 64-bit time type
> ktime_t, since 32-bit systems using struct timeval will break in the
> year 2038. Correspondingly change do_gettimeofday() to ktime_get()
> since ktime_get returns a ktime_t,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 23:09:20 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
>> This patch replaces timeval with timespec64 as 32 bit 'struct timeval'
>> will not give current time beyond 2038.
>>
>> This also changes the code to use
This driver uses 'struct timeval' which we are trying to remove since
32 bit time types will break in the year 2038 by replacing it with
ktime_t.
This patch changes do_gettimeofday() to ktime_get() because
ktime_get() returns a ktime_t while do_gettimeofday() returns struct
timeval.
This patch
On Oct 22 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 04:05:00 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
[...]
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann
>
> (adding the y2038 mailing list as well)
>
> > Changes in v2:
> > -Replaced timespec with timspec64
> > -Modified commit message
>
On Thursday 22 October 2015 15:07:50 Stefan Richter wrote:
> Looks fine to me, but I have a question. It was possibly already
> discussed at patch v1, though that was apparently not posted to an open
> list.
>
> include/linux/timekeeping.h says:
> #define ktime_get_real_ts64(ts)
On Thursday 22 October 2015 18:15:50 Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> This driver uses 'struct timeval' which we are trying to remove since
> 32 bit time types will break in the year 2038 by replacing it with
> ktime_t.
>
> This patch changes do_gettimeofday() to ktime_get() because
> ktime_get()
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:03:02 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 15:17:14 Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > > Rename old ioctl
13 matches
Mail list logo