Re: [Y2038] [RFC 02/15] vfs: Change all structures to support 64 bit time

2016-01-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 17:27:16 Dave Chinner wrote: > > I think > > it was more than that when I first looked, so it's between 0.2% and 0.3% > > of savings in total memory, which is certainly worth discussing about, > > given the renewed interest in conserving RAM in general. If we want to

Re: [Y2038] [RFC 02/15] vfs: Change all structures to support 64 bit time

2016-01-13 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 08:33:16AM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:29:57PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:42:36PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 04:33, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Wed,

Re: [Y2038] [RFC 02/15] vfs: Change all structures to support 64 bit time

2016-01-13 Thread Deepa Dinamani
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:29:57PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:42:36PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote: > > > On Jan 11, 2016, at 04:33, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:35:59PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote: Summarizing, here