>> @@ -3727,6 +3727,7 @@ static int ext4_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir,
>> struct dentry *old_dentry,
>> };
>> u8 new_file_type;
>> int retval;
>> + struct timespec ctime;
>>
>> if ((ext4_encrypted_inode(old_dir) ||
>>
>> @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
>> int min_leb_cnt = UBIFS_MIN_LEB_CNT;
>> long long tmp64, main_bytes;
>> __le64 tmp_le64;
>> + __le32 tmp_le32;
>> + struct timespec ts;
>>
>> /* Some functions called from
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 4:56:00 PM CEST Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Is there a policy about what justifies such an ABI break? I.e. is it
>
> The clear implication from the discussions around C++11 support in
> libstdc++, which resulted in the
