Sorry guys, I still cannot understand, what brings:
- renaming master->develop
- having potentially broken/not-mergable experimental branch.
If somebody can summarize me it in 2-3 words - would be fine.
For some "wild" stuff it is enough to have the own feature branch
and everybody can do there,
OK, I think I finally understood your intentions:
merge requests go to develop (renamed from master), with several devs
approving it with www interface.
experimental branch is not used for that, but for whatever wild stuff
comes into mind.
This way Jerome needs not to worry, and everyone is
2 matches
Mail list logo
