*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
I wrote iterations? Sorry, I meant interactions.
Unfortunately, the other fix in container doesn't seem to solve this
problem (it was not a duplicated bug).
In r2181, generate a TriaxialTest.xml and run
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
OK, open a new bugreport then. Anton's case is fixed.
BTW the fact that multi-threaded simulations are not deterministic has
been discussed here multiple times. That is not a bug.
--
New container causes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
You are right, the difference comes only when j=2 apparently (I didn't
notice it was the default!).
I reviewed the discussion about this : I'm still surprised roudings can
make such significant difference
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
I think if you ran without damping, the difference wouldn't be as
noticeable.
Cundall's damping is not Lorentz-like function that amplifies small
causes into big effect. It is function that is
I get it. So, it would be a good idea perhaps to reduce damping effects
on DOF i if vel[i] is close to 0 (perhaps using some sort of
non-dimensional proportionality factor)?
It also suggests applying damping separately on each DOF (not like in
Hentz) is better, regarding this feature, since the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
Thank you very much Vaclav! It works now as should work.
--
New container causes different results between r2091 and r2092
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563894
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
I cannot change the status of this big. The button does not work for me.
--
New container causes different results between r2091 and r2092
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563894
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
Oh, if it is duplicate, it takes status from the master bug. OK then.
--
New container causes different results between r2091 and r2092
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563894
You received this bug
Anton, I am not able to reproduce the bug with your script. I have 17716
with both r2091 and r2092, and 19872 with current (which is due to
regularHexa changes).
Bruno, can you be more precise? Different number of iterations could be
fine (finite precision, periodic engines bound to computation
Hi, Vaclav,
please, try to make a clean r2092 install and you should get the difference.
For one time I also got r2092 normal results, but after clean install I have
got again the problem.
Thank you
__
Anton Gladkyy
2010/4/25 Václav Šmilauer eudo...@arcig.cz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 569169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569169
OK, it seems it was due of bug #569169 after all. Please check by
redefining
def cohesiveContacts():
coh=[(i.id1,i.id2) for i in O.interactions if i.phys.isCohesive]
print
** Attachment added: test.py
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44275029/test.py
--
New container causes different results between r2091 and r2092
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563894
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
12 matches
Mail list logo
