Hi Chiara,
I have a better suggestion that would not need a new class. You could
add a variant of ScGeom::rotateAndGetShear() that would return incident
velocity instead of shear increment. It will not be a big deal to
compute normal and shear increments in your constitutive law if you have
On 18 May 2010 16:55, Bruno Chareyre bruno.chare...@hmg.inpg.fr wrote:
2) Why do we need to continue if fn==0?
IIRC Bruno told me that was to avoid contacts that transmit no force,
even if they have non-zero nominal stiffness. Exact zero will be there
for interactions that really had no
Hi guys,
just another quick question concerning damping before I commit my changes.
ATM VisoelasticPM requires the two constants cn and cs to work out the
viscous components. However, in HM I preferred to code the possibility to
enter the beta coefficients (betan and betas) through which is
3 matches
Mail list logo
