bisectionDecomposition.py is objectively better than
domaindecomposition.py. However, there is still utility in being able to
manually control the subdomains with domaindecomposition.py. And therefore
your corrections are very welcome :-)
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:52 PM Sacha Duverger
wrote:
>
Thank you for welcoming me,
I use domaindecomposition.py because the exemple I tried ([1]) used it. It
wasn’t up to date with the current version of YADE. Now that you mention
bisectionDecomposition.py, I’m beginning to think that I should have used [2]
instead.
[1] :
Out of curiosity, why are you using domaindecomposition.py instead of
bisectionDecomposition.py?
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 2:39 PM Janek Kozicki (yade) <
jkozicki-y...@pg.edu.pl> wrote:
> Hi, welcome here! :)
>
> Bruno is leading the MPI programming effort, I will let him do the honors
> ;)
> BTW,
Hi, welcome here! :)
Bruno is leading the MPI programming effort, I will let him do the honors ;)
BTW, he is in the middle of finishing the docs :)
best regards
Janek
Sacha Duverger said: (by the date of Thu, 14 May 2020 13:39:37 +0200)
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been using YADE since over a year
Hello,
I’ve been using YADE since over a year now. I recently tried to use the MPI
parallelisation and I believe I found a couple of errors in the
py/domaindecomposition.py script.
Could I join the yade-dev team so I can suggest my corrections? My username on
gitlab is @schd .
Thank you,
5 matches
Mail list logo
