Moved from https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/1814286 to
https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/issues/51
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols missing
It’s ok to merge that full commit including flowboundingsphere.
I will make a new merge request with the periodic insertion images.
Le mar. 5 févr. 2019 à 19:15, Janek Kozicki <1814...@bugs.launchpad.net> a
écrit :
> I think rebasing will work now :) Unless Robert will happen to have a
>
agreed. Let's merge it. It will be useful in my branch where I add more
text to documentation ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade
I think rebasing will work now :) Unless Robert will happen to have a
conflict in lib/triangulation/FlowBoundingSphereLinSolv.ipp which is in
the first commit in this branch. Let us know!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to
I think we can merge the branch now (without deleting it) since it fixes
a number of problem online already. Right?
We can keep working on the same branch for further improvement. That's
where the rebase question surfaces again maybe? ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
in formula (3) and (4) I guess that the problem is with \rm, not
something else...
https://yade-
dev.gitlab.io/-/trunk/-/jobs/156658986/artifacts/public/formulation.html
in further formulas there is also \curraccel, \nnextvel and \leq
By examining
[1] replaces \vec by \boldsymbol using Robert's trick in layout's preamble.
To me it sounds like a dirty trick to define latex conventions in the layout of
web pages but there seem to be no other option.
We could not see a problem with \rm, if there is one we can replace it
with \text or
It looks better and better! :)
https://yade-
dev.gitlab.io/-/trunk/-/jobs/156522519/artifacts/public/formulation.html
now problem is with \ensuremath \sortlines \vec and {\rm ..}.
If I recall correctly \rm is deprecated in latex and used to set roman
font.
aah, so it's entire preamble. No wonder that my simple \newcommand
replacement did not work. Congrats on finding this! :)
--
Janek Kozicki
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Ok, let us know Robert.
@Anton, do you mean that on some recent version at least the equations
compile correctly?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX
Alright, I think I figured out the problem. See [1] and the solution
[2]. He adds the latex macros (\def, \let, \newcommand, etc) to his
layout.html. I will try this today and report back :-)
[1]https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/726
Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:39:36
-)
> It sounds like the pragmatic move is to replace the macros by what
they mean. Search & replace should work, and I think there are very few
pages where those macros are used (if not just one page).
I've seen an error not
Just have a look at errors produced by imgmath
https://yade-
dev.gitlab.io/-/trunk/-/jobs/156037536/artifacts/public/formulation.html
from what I saw they occur in exactly the same places as errors in
mathjax (and where pngmath worked). The only difference is that they are
more informative, and
It sounds like the pragmatic move is to replace the macros by what they mean.
Search & replace should work, and I think there are very few pages where those
macros are used (if not just one page).
Bruno
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is
I checked on debian Buster (inside chroot). The problem is also present
there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade documentation
Robert Caulk said: (by the date of Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:07:16 -)
> Have you tried replacing \def with \newcommand locally Janek?
yes, it did not help.
--
Janek Kozicki
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
Sorry for causing those problems. Yes, I did not check this
change on older distributions.
Anyway, the pngmath is deprecated in sphinx_1.8, so this
change is necessary for the newer distributions, where 1.8
is used.
If imgmath is not working properly, we need to investigate
the problem deeper.
>>Hmm, this search in Buster indicates that pngmath is still there,
am I missing something?
I guess it exists without support based on this warning thrown by make
doc:
"WARNING: sphinx.ext.pngmath has been deprecated. Please use
sphinx.ext.imgmath instead."
Have you tried replacing \def with
Yes, I had the same errors locally with imgmath: https://yade-
dev.gitlab.io/-/trunk/-/jobs/156037536/artifacts/public/formulation.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Anton Gladky said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:46:29 -)
> I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more,
> so the change is really necessary
Hmm, this search in Buster indicates that pngmath is still there,
am I missing something?
Strange, I tried reverting that commit [1] and the problem persisted.
[1] https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/commit/34fb5ffef
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various
Hm, maybe this means that switching to mathjax breaks build on all older
ubuntus. I wonder if it is possible to make this switch dependable on
python-sphinx version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
Anton did this when preparing for debian relelase, and there python-
sphinx is 1.7.9. Maybe that is related?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols
it was this commit actually:
https://gitlab.com/yade-
dev/trunk/commit/34fb5ffef7b235274b838583cf8da1b149123e3e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols
I am unable to identify the source of the problem. I tried reverting [1]
and [2], but the problem persists. I tried changing delimiters, I tried
replacing \def with \newcommand (despite the fact that we should not
have to, see #12), but the problem persists.
It is worth reiterating that all PDF
According to [1], \def and \let should both work fine with mathjax
[1]http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/tex.html#tex-commands
I think this has something more to do with the the delimiters [2].
Testing now, will report back.
[2] http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/tex.html#defining-tex-macros
--
Right of course. I am doing this right now every 15 minutes, and I
forgot to tell Robert about that ;)
There is also `make doc/fast` but I didn't notice any difference.
Chareyre said: (by the date of Fri, 01 Feb 2019 19:25:57 -)
> This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc»
This is not website-related. You can simply «make doc» locally and check
html output.
It is a good opportunity to play with gitlab pipeline, still, but it will
also imply ~8min of full recompile time...
B
Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 18:20, Robert Caulk <1814...@bugs.launchpad.net> a
écrit :
> Yes,
Hi guys,
I committed those changes. pngmath is not part of sphinx any more,
so the change is really necessary
Anton
Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb Robert Caulk
<1814...@bugs.launchpad.net>:
>
> Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
> on the web.
> Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
> merging to develop branch?
Yes, a merge request performs a build, then you can click
"artifacts" in the finished build, and then click "browse".
So you can examine output before approving the MR.
Good find, thanks.
if I
Yes, Mathjax seems cleaner. Does it result in better resolution of math
on the web. The old equations used to look grainy with pngmath iirc.
Is there a way to test changes and their effect on the website without
merging to develop branch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Maybe http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/misc/faq.html#does-mathjax-
support-tex-macros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX symbols missing in Yade
Before 34fb5ffef all equations in the html were retrieved from png files.
With "mathjax instead of pngmath" they are replaced by inline code, which
actually works for some of them, but not all of them.
You probably found why (#1).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The problem appeared in [1].
Maybe it fixed the new sphinx while breaking the older one?
B
[11] https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/commit/34fb5ffef
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
Ah, it is probably worth moving away from pngmath. I guess we just need
to rewrite the \defs to accommodate mathjax?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814286
Title:
Various LaTeX
Ok, after downloading the artifacts from the build, the PDF is built
perfectly fine.
This must be an issue on the HTML decoding webside, or something like
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.
In fact, it looks like the compiler is ignoring \defs. For example:
\Dtcr [1] is defined by:
\def\Dtcr{\Dt_{\rm cr}}
Meanwhile other typical latex symbols are printing fine.
https://yade-dev.gitlab.io/trunk/formulation.html#estimation-of-by-wave-propagation-speed
--
You received this bug
37 matches
Mail list logo
